![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't think this is true. Well, yes, it is true that interpreting the Resurrection as metaphorical is bulls--t, and that if you can believe that Jesus' dad created the universe then you can sure as h--l believe that He can do a little cellular regeneration; but I mean that this is too narrow a definition of Christianity. Suppose I am a Protestant who believes in the literal truth of the Bible. When I die and go to Heaven, God says, "Welcome! Before you go in, I need to clear up a big misunderstanding. Jesus was and is my sacred Son, made of the same substance as I; and He is God, just like me. However, He didn't actually come back from the dead; He descended into Hell, and then ascended straight to Heaven, where He remained and will remain until the end of days."
I'm not going to respond to this with, "Welp, I guess I'm no longer a Christian!" That would be really stupid. By contrast, if when I got to Heaven God said "I need to clear something up: Jesus is only the 'son of God' in the sense that King David was. He was a very good prophet, but no more divine than any other prophet", then I would say, "Oh, I guess I'm no longer a Christian."